Update 3/11/10: Some of the questions that I raise in the following blog post have since been answered by a representative of the Engleton Neighborhood Group. You can read the response in the comments. However, several concerns still remain that I hope city council addresses at this evening’s meeting.
In case you haven’t heard, Harrisburg City Council is considering expanding the Paxtang Manor permit parking zone in Midtown. There is a hearing scheduled for it on March 11 at 5:05.
While I have not read the exact text of this ordinance, it is being advertised as the following:
Bill 3-2010 – An Ordinance amending Chapter 3-139 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Harrisburg to extend and define the boundaries of the “Paxtang Manor Zone,” and to designate as Residential Permit Parking only the following streets:
N. Third Street from Clinton to Harris,
Harris Street from N. Third to Green Street,
Green Street from Harris to Reily Street,
Reily Street from N. Third to Second Street,
Penn Street from Reily to Harris Street,
Susquehanna Street from Calder to Reily Street,
Green Street from Granite to Kelker Street,
1300 Block of Susquehanna Street,
1300 and 1400 Blocks of Front Street,
100 Block of Calder Street, and
1300 Block of Green Street.
Bill 8-2010 regarding enforcement of metered parking in residential permit parking zones.
Whether your exact address is included in this new zone or not, I encourage you to consider how this will effect our neighborhood, as it will change parking dynamics for everyone.
To help us become informed, I have plotted all of these addresses on a map with the existing permit parking zones. (Note: I developed this map by biking around the neighborhood and recording where there are actual permit parking signs. Although I called City Hall asking for this information, I was not able to receive it. The unidentified woman in the Parking Enforcement section was rude, and led me in a Catch-22 conversation to describe why she couldn’t give me the information that I requested)
The map is attached or can be viewed at this website:
http://www.scribblemaps.com/maps/view/HBGPaxtangManor
It it my belief that this is seriously flawed. Perhaps I’m missing something, but based on the advertised information I see several problems. In general, I am not opposed to permit parking; however, I oppose this ordinance in my current understanding of it. Here’s why:
- The proposed zone is not even close to contiguous. It contains four unconnected sections of road, including Green Street from Granite to Kelker Street. This block is three blocks away from the rest of the zone, and it is not close to any notable commercial areas. Why was it included?
- The proposed zone includes two blocks of Reily Street which have many commercial and educational establishments that are open to the public. I do not think it is in the best interest of neighborhood revitalization to restrict public parking in front of these establishments. In particular, the section of Reily Street from Green to Third has only three residences, two of which also border other streets. This block also has approximately 25 on-street parking spaces. It seems absurd to make all of these spaces permit parking when the bulk of activity on the block is public. Furthermore, several of the properties on this block are zoned for commercial and institutional purposes in both the existing and proposed zoning code. This ordinance would place permit parking in front of commercially zoned properties.
- Two blocks of Front Street are included in the proposed zone. These blocks currently have no on-street parking at all. Is it the intention of this ordinance to allow on-street permit parking on Front Street for these blocks? If not, what is the purpose of including them in the ordinance?
- The 100 Block of Calder Street and the 1300 Block of Green Street are included in the proposed zone. However, these blocks are already marked on the street as being part of the Paxtang Manor permit zone. If they are part of the existing zone, why are they being included in this ordinance? If they are not already officially permit parking, then why are there signs on the street?
In conclusion, ask yourself, “Why were these blocks in particular chosen? What benefit will come from having these blocks designated while neighboring blocks remain permit free? Who is in support of this measure, and what is their motive? Will this make our neighborhood a more attractive place to live, work, shop, and play?”
If it is City Council’s intent to pass this, I hope that they give some good answers to these questions first.
While I have more to say about permit parking, in the name of brevity, I’ll stop for now…

